Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:54:26 -0400 To: Earnie Boyd Cc: cygwin developers Subject: Re: cygdrive confusing (was Re: new cygwin.dll (was Re: Make problems)) Message-ID: <19990616105426.C895@cygnus.com> References: <19990616115714 DOT 13831 DOT rocketmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <19990616115714.13831.rocketmail@web116.yahoomail.com>; from Earnie Boyd on Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 04:57:14AM -0700 On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 04:57:14AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- Chris Faylor wrote: >> I'm not sure why you think this should be empty. The value of "cygdrive >> prefix" is used for drives which do not have corresponding mount table >> entries. That means if you want to access the foo directory on your q: >> drive you use: >> >> /cygdrive/q/foo >> > >I see much confusion about this getting ready to happen. Would it be wise to >change "cygdrive" to "unmounted" which gives a description of what it's about? You can do this if you want. Personally, I like "cygdrive" since that is more descriptive, and it is not an English word so it is unlikely to be used. Perhaps if I understood the confusion I would be more amenable to the proposal but I have to confess that I don't. cgf