Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <37616E1F.3D6D822B@vinschen.de> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 22:14:23 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Faylor CC: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: No more .core files References: <19990610224952 DOT A26687 AT cygnus DOT com> <3760C1E0 DOT 459A3D41 AT vinschen DOT de> <19990611111702 DOT B795 AT cygnus DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Faylor wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 09:59:28AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Chris Faylor wrote: > >> > >> I just changed the name of the files produced by cygwin from > >> something.core to something.stackdump. Hopefully this will help > >> minimize some confusion and pave the way for true core files in the > >> future -- once I finally get the assignment form from Egor. > > > >The something.stackdump files will die then? Good news. > > Only if someone has selected that they want to have core files. > > I think that the stackdump files are marginally useful. They allow > me to say "It's not cygwin's fault." pretty quickly by inspecting the > address where a fault occurred. I understand. Assuming, Egor has signed, shouldn't this behaviour be controlled by the CYGWIN variable e.g (no)core (no)dump? I think, this would be useful and convenient options. Corinna