From: khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Subject: RE: libg++
19 Sep 1998 19:17:35 -0700
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.980919210209.28230E-100000.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
References: <01BDE3B9 DOT 354CC340 AT sos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
To: Sergey Okhapkin <sos AT prospect DOT com DOT ru>
Cc: "'Geoffrey Noer'" <noer AT cygnus DOT com>,
        "'cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com>

On Sat, 19 Sep 1998, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:

> Too bad... Some software still require it, libstdc++ is not 100% compatible, for example sysent.h is missed there.
> 

Note that libstdc++ is not meant to be compatible with libg++. In fact,
libstdc++ doesn't even acknowledge the existence of libg++.

Of course sysent.h is not a standard header, and we should probably
encourage maintainers to remove obsolete headers. Most of us had to
do the same porting old cfront code to conform to the new C++.

Could you please list the packages that still depend on libg++?

Regards,
Mumit