From: jeffdbREMOVETHIS AT goodnet DOT com (Mikey) Subject: Re: structure packing/allingment 29 Apr 1998 23:36:44 -0700 Message-ID: <354a1423.44565668.cygnus.cygwin32.developers@smtp.goodnet.com> References: <9804300514 DOT AA10682 AT modi DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> Reply-To: jeffdbREMOVETHIS AT goodnet DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin32-developers AT cygnus DOT com That's interesting, with my patch I get MIKEY:~$ ./bitpack-gcc.exe Size of foo1 is 8 Size of foo2 is 8 because of -m486 obviously apparently we need to place a default #pragma pack(1) somewhere in the system headers, or the specs file, to get exactly correct behavior. ( which means figuring out the real structure packing for all the mingw32/win32api headers what fun!!! ;^0 ) with a #pragma pack(1) wrapped around the structs I get MIKEY:~$ ./bitpack-gcc.exe Size of foo1 is 2 Size of foo2 is 2 On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:13:14 -0500, you wrote: >jeffdbREMOVETHIS AT goodnet DOT com (Mikey) writes: >> >> #define PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS 0 >> this was defined in the emx port, and the guy apparently >> knows what he is doing with structure alignment. >> ( I couldn't run the test at the end because I don't have cl.exe :) >> If this is handeled somewhere else in the gcc config files, >> I couldn't find it. > >Mikey, good catch! Here's what I get from GCC and MSVC4: > > $ ./bitpack-gcc.exe > Size of foo1 is 2 > Size of foo2 is 5 > $ ./bitpack-msvc4.exe > Size of foo1 is 2 > Size of foo2 is 2 > >Mumit > >ps: I still haven't had time to look at your latest ld patches. Sorry. No prob ;^) like I said at the time it isn't the REAL solution. I'll probably take a stab at fixing gas/bfd once I get this link-compat-SDK posted somewhere ;^) > ===================================================== Linux a platform built by, and for users, standing on the firm legs of reliability, and speed. Microsoft Windows, a platform without a leg to stand on. (jeffdbREMOVETHIS AT goodnet DOT com) delete REMOVETHIS from the above to reply Mikey