Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D03EB69.6050005@netscape.net> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 19:57:29 -0400 From: Nicholas Wourms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" CC: cygwin-apps AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org Subject: Re: gcj patches for cygwin gcc-3.1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: >There is more work in store before it really works. All I have done >is get rid of a few compile time errors and patch the testsuite. There >are bugs in the libjava libraries. > >None of these patches are in the main 3.1 branch. All but the >configure.host patch, which is required to build with unmodified >binutils, are in the 3.2 branch. > >At present I bootstrap with a gcc/ada version of gcc-3.1 using the >following options. Note that > - ARFLAGS=crP is required to build libjava > - you can't make gnatlib_and_tools without an ada bootstrap compiler > >You need dejagnu-1.4.2 to run the g++ tests. Even with that, "make check" >will die a horrible death in libjava without a very nasty hack to >/usr/share/dejagnu/remote.exp (below) to work around another problem - >possibly a cygwin bug - that I haven't followed up. > > Well, I assume the changes are in the "cygwin-mingw-gcc-3_1-branch" right? The ChangeLog for it says so... Also, any luck with the objective-c compiler/libs in this version?