Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:11:03 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running Message-ID: <20020516161103.GC2893@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:30:52PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] >> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:32 PM >> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running >> >> >> Here is a fix for the problem of postinstall not running. >> >> I'm not going to check this one into the trunk because it >> uses a static variable and "feels wrong" as a result. I >> think we probably need to change the find interface, either >> to just return the relative path or the full path as needed. > >Hmm. I think we actually want to make it more oop. It should call into >an object, not a 'find routine'. The passed in value will be the >relative value, and the object gets to decide whether to prepend the >path it called find with or not. That's exactly what I was thinking. cgf