Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CD3DD22.76BD5C0@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 09:07:46 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: Charles Wilson , cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new cygwin package: cgoban References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] > > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:04 AM > > > Volker Zell agreed. Nobody else responded. I kinda like it, but FHS > > has moved away from that; now on Red Hat systems it appears that ONLY > > those programs specifically part of XFree86 are included there -- or > > programs whose purpose is to manipulate XFree86 itself (like > > third-party > > Xconfigurators and such). > > I'm agnostic on this one, I don't use X enough to really care. However, > Earnie has pointed out that extra path elements have a lamentable > performance impact, so perhaps we should be avoiding that? > I see it's time for me to chime in. We the cygwin-apps developers must insist that all X11 packages use --prefix=/usr/X11R6 because it's possible for an X11 package to be both Win32 and X11, E.G.: rxvt. And I the user could want to use either depending on the moode (spelling intentional) I'm in. Earnie.