Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CCDDC54.6030700@lapo.it> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 01:50:44 +0200 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it-IT; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417 X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mailing List: CygWin-Apps Subject: Re: RFC: setup.ini change References: <01c001c1ef81$bb425230$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020429194026 DOT 02c52b30 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >>>install: release/bash/bash-20000901.tar.bz2 276403 >>>158044165a04791968a7e7fc8daaef9e >>>source: release/bash/bash-20000901-src.tar.bz2 1892899 >>>158044165a04791968a7e7fc8daaef9f >>> >>>Any preference folk? >>> >>> >>> >>Why don't directly inline? (filename length md5sum) >> >>install: release/bash/bash-20000901.tar.bz2 276403 158044165a04791968a7e7fc8daaef9e >>source: release/bash/bash-20000901-src.tar.bz2 1892899 158044165a04791968a7e7fc8daaef9f >> >> >I'm guessing you didn't notice that Rob's proposal was "inline". It's >various email clients that are doing the apparent line wrap (as you'll >notice with your email above). > > I wonder why my "proposal" didn't get wrapped ?_? Must be the wrapping of Rob's mailer, not mine.. but anyhow.. I vote for that option 0=) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)