Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3CCD381F.3A0CE289@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:10:07 -0400
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>, Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: [Fwd: Re[2]: 'redownload' aka download again and cygwin setup]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

So tell the list not me.

Earnie.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re[2]: 'redownload' aka download again and cygwin setup
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:04:07 +0200
From: Marco Müllers <Marco AT Versatile DOT de>
Reply-To: Marco Müllers <Marco AT Versatile DOT de>
Organization: Marco Müllers
To: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
References:
<00ad01c1ef6f$2066a250$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks><3CCD2F4E DOT E97B6128 AT yahoo DOT com>


EB> I've used the redownload feature to reget a corrupted downloaded
file. 
EB> Not often, but it's worth saving the functionality.

That's correct, at this moment I use it  in fact of the same matter.

cu,
 Marco                            mailto:Marco AT Versatile DOT de

EB> Earnie.

EB> Robert Collins wrote:
>> 
>> Ok. Time for a straw poll.
>> 
>> Please write back (to me or the list, your choice) whether you use the
>> DELIBERATE 'download again' functionality of setup.exe or not.
>> And if so, how often and for what purpose.
>> 
>> This is to determine if certain functionality that -in essence- causes
>> the 'accidental' redownloading of files in 'download only' mode.
>> 
>> Both positive and negative answers are useful, but in the absence of any
>> significant number of answers, I will assume that no-one uses the
>> functionality.
>> 
>> Unless there is a real user need for it, the functionality will be
>> removed in the next setup.exe release.
>> 
>> Rob