Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CCB2192.6050001@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:09:22 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libgetopt++ and setup and libstdc++ References: <20020427210812 DOT GF24659 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:38:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >>As usual, nothing is fixed in stone, and if this is a significant issue, >>it can be revisited. >> > > I have to agree with Earnie here. AFAIK, every other toolchain on > sources.redhat.com stores the autogenerated files in CVS. Mebbe so. But it's not unusual for projects to require folks who want to get the source from CVS to have/use the autotools to bootstrap. I mean, getting the "latest source from CVS" is really developerish sort of thing to do... OTOH, if you're setting a *policy* for sources.redhat.com-hosted projects, that's fine too. --Chuck