Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 04:02:12 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Ralf Habacker" , "Charles Wilson" Cc: "Kde-Cygwin" , "Binutils" , "Cygwin-Apps" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3RI2gH24389 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de] > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 10:17 PM > To: Robert Collins; Charles Wilson > Cc: Kde-Cygwin; Binutils; Cygwin-Apps > Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld > > > >A patch to use hint ordinals when linking by name would be _very_ > >useful though, as that would > >a) give the performance benefit you are looking for > >b) allow backward compatible library versioning as link-by-name does. > > But as I stated already, this needs an ld switch to > enable/disable ordinal linking and allow limiting of used libs or path Hangon, lets go back a bit. Why do you want ordinal-only linking? For runtime or link-time performance? Or for on-disk import library size? Or.... Rob