Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:25:40 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Ralf Habacker" , "Charles Wilson" Cc: "Kde-Cygwin" , "Binutils" , "Cygwin-Apps" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3R0PrO16325 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de] > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Robert Collins; Charles Wilson > Cc: Kde-Cygwin; Binutils; Cygwin-Apps > Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld > > > > The PE spec (as I read it) indicates that as long as a name is > > included (ie it's not link-only-by-ordinal) then ordinals > can change > > and nothing will break. > > > > It's only when the only link information is the ordinal > that problems > > will appear. > > Or ld has a switch to explicit use ordinals (see other mails from me) I don't see what such a switch gains. The hint ordinal should provide the same performance as an ordinal-only-link. Rob