Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020426162650.02ca4db0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:29:42 -0400 To: Earnie Boyd , Charles Wilson From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: ITP: netpbm Cc: "Gerrit P. Haase" , Jan Nieuwenhuizen , cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3CC9B278.D4B9C10A@yahoo.com> References: <87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020426153847 DOT 02c89b08 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3CC9B130 DOT 1000309 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 04:03 PM 4/26/2002, Earnie Boyd wrote: >As for the # of executables in the /bin directory, isn't there a limit >to the number of files and/or directory entries in any one directory on >win32? I remember something vague about the number of entries in a directory on FAT (not FAT32) partitions but I'm not sure whether it applies to files, directories, or both (probably both). Depending on what the restriction is, this may be a good argument for being cautious of putting too much stuff in bin. Anybody remember more about this FAT limitation? Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX