Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CC9AF76.3070206@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:50:14 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gerrit P. Haase" CC: Jan Nieuwenhuizen , cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ITP: netpbm References: <87r8l2pf8w DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <1971249499475 DOT 20020426203802 AT familiehaase DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Thumbs up from me;) > > BUT: > Is it possible to put all the binaries into a separate directory > and not to flood /bin ? > > There are 223 .exe files (the scripts and .dll not counted)! > That's one of the things my setup-compatible private version did -- but since it was private, I could do whatever I wanted. In Jan's case...we need to discuss it. I vote for a special exception to the "all executables go in /usr/bin" rule specifically for netpbm. /usr/bin/netpbm/ for the exe's, but /usr/bin for the DLLs. --Chuck