Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:42:00 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cinstall location Message-ID: <20020425154200.GB11445@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:32:08AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > sometime ago in a conversation about cinstall and the all-in-one >setup the topic of cinstall's location was rasied. At that point I >didn't see any need to move cinstall.... but I'd actually like to see it >moved to the cygwin-apps repository now. > >Why? >So that we can add a build dependency on a mingw libstdc++, and be done >with reinventing multiple wheels. > >I think that while moving won't be trauma-less, it will result in more >rapid development, and that can only be a good thing. It will also make >having a cinstall -src tarball easier, and the cygwin src snapshots >smaller. > >It's not intended to lessen the link between cinstall and cygwin at all, >rather to make building it easier. > >What do you think? I have no problems moving it. It never really fit into the winsup hierarchy. I put it there because I didn't want to make a new upper level directory on src and there was no cygwin-apps at the time. Let's rename the directory to 'setup', though. FWIW, I think I will physically move the cvs directory to a new location, wiping out all hints of cinstall from winsup. cgf