Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:54:51 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing Message-ID: <20020418025451.GA23633@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:14:30PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: >I have setup an anonymous ftp site with preliminary Cygwin/XFree86 >setup.exe packages: ftp://huntharo-4.user.msu.edu/pub/cygwin/ Looks like you figured out upset. Sorry about not responding. >These is based entirely off of Ian Burrell's work. > >My primary concerns that I don't know how to resolve are: >1) I didn't do the XFree86-base "meta" package properly. setup.exe >does not list XFree86-base as a package and it doesn't enforce the >dependencies of the other packages on XFree86-base. It needs at least an empty tar file. >2) I'm not sure why, but uninstalling packages often leaves files >around. For example, uninstalling XFree86-f100 delete all files from >/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/ except for "UTRG__24.pcf.gz". Weird. There was another report of cygwin not removing files in the cygwin mailing list. Was that possibly the last in the list from a /etc/setup/whatever.lst.gz file? >3) We may need a short post-install script, based off of Xinstall.sh, >that runs mkfontdir in the /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local and >/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc font directories. Xinstall.sh says it >does this to make sure that these directories are "up to date". I >guess that every font package has the right to install fonts in local >or misc, but it seems that none of them do. Perhaps this won't matter. How about mounting the font directory in binmode, too? cgf