Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CBDC900.8000908@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:12:00 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com CC: cygwin AT hack DOT kampbjorn DOT com Subject: Re: strange source packaging? References: <3CBDA9CF DOT 877BBFA4 AT lapo DOT it> <20020417181926 DOT GD16703 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: > >>Why the wget-1.8.1-1-src.tar.bz2 package does contain wget-1.8.1.tar.gz >>? >> > > That would be what is called in the software community "a mistake". > > Can this be corrected, asap, Hack? ??? Chris, are you disagreeing with this post , or repudiating the packaging method used by the packages listed below (and maybe others I missed), or merely asserting that when gzip -dc foo.tar.gz | bzip2 > foo.tar.bz2, then foo.tar.bz2 is still just as "original" as foo.tar.gz? --Chuck autoconf-devel autoconf-stable autoconf automake-devel automake-stable automake bzip2 cygutils gdbm gettext jbigkit jpeg libbz2_0 libintl libintl1 libncurses5 libncurses6 libpng libpng2 libreadline4 libreadline5 libtool-devel libtool-stable libtool libxml2 libxslt mktemp ncftp ncurses pkgconfig popt readline terminfo tiff units wget which xpm-nox zlib