Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: fastcall
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:23:28 +1000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008AC63@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g382NZM23093



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] 
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:15 AM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: fastcall
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:54:00AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >>Chris asked the question a while ago: "Wanna be a binutils 
> >>maintainer".
> >
> >Are you asking if someone here can step up?  I'd love to, 
> but I suspect 
> >I don't have the time to do a good job.  I'm struggling to 
> answer all 
> >setup.exe related questions at the moment.  Also, I think 
> the issue is 
> >needing the binutils w32 maintainer, not a cygwin port 
> maintainer, and 
> >frankly, I've no idea what sort of time commitment that entails.  If 
> >someone (perhaps DJ) can clarify that I'll consider stepping up for 
> >that maintainership - on the basis of someone being better 
> than no-one, 
> >even if I'm a bit slow on response for them.
> 
> Maybe we can all be a binutils maintainer committee.  How 
> about selecting three people to oversee patches, Danny, Me, 
> and Robert (Chuck and Corinna are also welcome).  If, after 
> voting, no one disagrees with a patch, it can go in.  One of 
> us can do the manual work of checking it in.
> 
> How does that sound?
> 
> Robert, out of curiousity, do you have an assignment with the FSF?

Yes, for GNU litbool. If I need to do another, I'm quite happy to do so.

Rob