Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:59:45 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe rebase patch Message-ID: <20020227025945.GA26911@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020207134119 DOT GB1804 AT dothill DOT com> <027701c1bd28$c4666170$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020225153441 DOT GA2544 AT hp DOT com> <018901c1be4f$6752fbb0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020226212652 DOT GC2288 AT hp DOT com> <3C7C491D DOT 7000302 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C7C491D.7000302@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:49:01PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Jason Tishler wrote: > > >>>(Or do you rebase cygwin1.dll as well :]]). >>> >> >>Yes, I can rebase cygwin1.dll too. This is why I converted the >>stand-alone rebase to a Mingw app. > > >Urk. If we follow Earnie's suggestion to include the output of 'objdump >-S1' with cygwin1.dlll snapshots and the (main)cygwin package, then >rebasing cygwin1.dll will break that. Seems like rebasing cygwin1.dll >itself should never be the default behavior... > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2002-02/msg00029.html I suppose that if we were really clever we could detect where cygwin was offset to and readjust the symbol file accordingly as needed. However, I agree that rebasing shouldn't be the default behavior. In fact, I wonder if I should make cygwin non-rebaseable. It would load faster if I did that. cgf