Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:24:05 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Setup Message-ID: <20020224162405.GC17909@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <015a01c1b886$622561b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <002501c1b8e4$9754b5d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020219040513 DOT GA372 AT redhat DOT com> <009701c1b8fc$a8eedba0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020219044601 DOT GA597 AT redhat DOT com> <01b801c1bd23$0a440720$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01b801c1bd23$0a440720$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:04:32PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >> I don't think that setup.exe should automatically switch to Uninstall >> in any circumstances unless the package maintainer has specifically >> indicated that is the correct behavior. Somehow. > >I agree. My point has been (from the beginning) about *where* that >intent gets indicated. No, you're not agreeing if you think that a setup.ini file can be crafted in such a way that an "Uninstall" will show up without the package maintainer explicitly somehow saying "I want this package to be uninstalled". And, not making a test version of a package available is not "explicit". cgf