Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:57:20 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Setup Message-ID: <20020223035720.GA1222@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <015a01c1b886$622561b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <005701c1b8f0$0e3794f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <008901c1b8f8$b8d2afa0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <030301c1bbf1$f66967e0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:48:04PM -0500, Brian Keener wrote: >Robert Collins wrote: >> What TAG did you build from? setup200202 works fine for me, and doesn't >> uninstall installed packages when test is selected. Like Chris I feel > >Built from HEAD - which is why I guess the fix for the Test/Uninstall wasn't >there, but once I applied the patch for the Test/Uninstall fix to my copy then >Test/Keep as opposed to Test/Uninstall works great. > >> he solution is wrong, but I can't articulate (yet) how the model is >> wrong, and so I've followed the (apparent) consensus. > >I don't know why that doesn't seem right to you. I think Robert was saying that the whole prev/curr/test model feels wrong. But, perhaps uncharacteristically, neither of us has an opinion on how to change it. :-) cgf