Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <002501c1b8e4$9754b5d0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>, <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <015a01c1b886$622561b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <VA DOT 00000a82 DOT 00e1d48b AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Subject: Re: Setup
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:27:26 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2002 01:26:39.0945 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B0AE390:01C1B8E4]


===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Keener" <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>


> Robert Collins wrote:
> > Ok, final feedback and bug-killing time folk.
>
> The other couple of things I've noticed are probably open for
preference so I
> will throw them out for general consensus:
>
> 1) If I have a group of packages installed and I select the
> Test option to see what packages are available for in Test should all
the
> packages I have installed that do not have a Test Version show
Uninstall or
> should they should keep??  It is my contention that thy should show
keep and
> not uninstall - unless I explicitly request uninstall.

I have emailed trying to start a discussion on this at least twice. My
contention is that this is a factor for setup.ini to take care of, not
setup.exe. It's easier to add entries than have complex logic for
removing them when they aren't appropriate.

> 2) If I am doing and "Install from Local Directory" and the Source
file does
> not exist in the Local path should the option for Source only or the
Sources
> checkbox even be available?? It is my contention again that if the
Sources
> cannot be found then the option should not exist.

Patches gratefully accepted.

Rob