Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:56:57 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Intent to package: keychain
Message-ID: <20020216175657.GA27439@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3C6C5C3D DOT F42C08AA AT hack DOT kampbjorn DOT com> <3C6D03D6 DOT EC63C93C AT yahoo DOT com> <3C6E97DE DOT A76A04E9 AT hack DOT kampbjorn DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C6E97DE.A76A04E9@hack.kampbjorn.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:33:18PM +0100, Hack Kampbj?rn wrote:
>Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>Where's the tarball?  Sounds like it would get my vote but where's the
>>tarball?  You've got to put up a local copy of the tarball for us to
>>eyeball.
>>
>
>That's not how I understood the setup.html instructions: first proposed
>to do the package and if nobody is against then submit the package for
>review.

Yep.  You've got it right.  If there is a general interest in the
package then you take it to the next step.

cgf