Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <058901c1b59d$2cb1fe80$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <011401c1b53b$01de5350$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020214151909 DOT GE23253 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:18:39 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2002 21:18:00.0170 (UTC) FILETIME=[1482E4A0:01C1B59D] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:19 AM Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:35:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >Ok, > > finally got some breathing time. > > > >Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch. > > > >This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see > >*where* the extra 100K appeared from). > > > >Chris - is this a problem? IMO it's still a tiny fraction of the total > >distribution size, and we're reducing the number of reasons a setup > >update is *required* as we make /etc/profile and so on into packages. > > I dunno. I think it probably is a problem. I assume that you're using > more of libstdc++.a which will be a problem for cross compiles. No, we're not using more of libstdc++.a. It's purely a size issue AFAICT. I'll do a test cross compile this evening. Rob