Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:04:09 EST
To: Cygwin-Apps <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: CVS setup.exe doesn't update zlib
X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va
Message-Id: <VA.00000a71.006bf3ca@thesoftwaresource.com>
From: Brian Keener <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com
In-Reply-To: <026d01c1b585$aeef9820$9b00a8c0@mchasecompaq>
References: <20020207134119 DOT GB1804 AT dothill DOT com> <008401c1b13b$9cd24fa0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020211134953 DOT GB2256 AT dothill DOT com> <026d01c1b585$aeef9820$9b00a8c0 AT mchasecompaq>

Michael A Chase wrote:
> I've been using the latest CVS version of setup.exe for a couple weeks now.
> The only real problem I'm seeing is that it won't update zlib.  I thought I
> saw a proposed patch for that go by a while ago, but I don't have it now.
>
I think I have the patch but it was in Download I thought and I don't think it 
is that it won't update zlib (although you might be seeing a different problem) 
but I think it is not updating whatever is the last package I select for update 
and then only if I am doing an install from local directory - it seems to 
download it and install from the internet just fine - I've been trying to debug 
it but my skills are beginner at best.

The other couple of things I've noticed are cosmetic and personal and 
definitely not show stoppers although I really don't like that if I select the 
Test option that all the packages that don't have a test show up as uninstall 
as opposed to keep.  Also cosmetically speaking I think if I am doing an 
Install from Local directory and the Source file does not exist I should not 
have and option for the Source to be installed.

bk