Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:08:36 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: rebase for setup. Message-ID: <20020117120836.GA252@dothill.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <018101c1880b$affd10a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011219032813 DOT GG10253 AT redhat DOT com> <20011221125117 DOT GC1792 AT dothill DOT com> <027401c18bae$25318fe0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011227174434 DOT GC2204 AT dothill DOT com> <045a01c18f34$10a73730$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020103131837 DOT GA1940 AT dothill DOT com> <09df01c19459$8414f250$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020116212054 DOT GA2400 AT dothill DOT com> <3C45F1BA DOT 3442C62F AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C45F1BA.3442C62F@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Earnie, On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:33:46PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > > Any ideas why stripping prevents some DLLs from being rebased and > > not others? Any solutions besides not stripping? > > Text mode mounts? No, I have only used binary mode mounts since I started using Cygwin (aka gnu-win32) six years ago. Besides the stripped DLLs are valid DLLs -- they just are not able to be rebased. Jason