Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:33:09 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers) Message-ID: <20020109183309.GB6261@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C3C8A0E.9000100@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:21:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Preliminary versions are here: > > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/ > >See this message (and the thread that follows it) for more info: > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2001-12/msg00179.html > >Although I will support these packages -- as "cygwin applications" I do >NOT intend to answer "how do I use libtool" questions. I will silently >drop any message to the cygwin list concerning these packages that I >believe are *libtool* questions and not *cygwin* questions -- without >even a "go ask on the libtool mailing list" reply. > >1) is the above attitude acceptable? If not, then is anybody else >willing to take over those packages and "ITP" them? >2) is "rc6" okay for a ${REL} number, or should it be a pure number? >(p.s. 'rc' means "robert collins hack" not "release candidate") upset will do the right thing with it. I just checked. It even seems to properly support rc6 vs. rc7. I don't have any problems with it but it *is* a departure from the guidelines in http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I believe. I'll let Robert make the executive decision on this one, I think. cgf