Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:54:08 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: "'cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: setup.hint Message-ID: <20011221105408.L21898@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from John.Morrison@uk.experian.com on Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:35:24AM -0000 On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:35:24AM -0000, Morrison, John wrote: > I just thought, when I'd had a question about the maintence of > X it would be nice to personally address the person (even if > the email goes to the list...) That's what I'm trying to avoid all the time. I don't want to get always two message of the same content, just because I'm Cc'd. What sense is in that? > BTW, what are the good reasons you can see for a list of > maintainer => package relationships? For one, I don't know the maintainers of all our packages. ;-) For the team of maintainers it would exactly have the purpose of your setup.hint suggestion has but w/o being public. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.