Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: From: "Morrison, John" To: "'Robert Collins'" , "Morrison, John" , cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Cc: ian AT caliban DOT org Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:50:03 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Question: does experimental == test? If it does then we shouldn't refer to things as experimental but as being 'in test'. If not then should the test: line in setup.hint be changed to experimental: ? I know it's more typing but... J. > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au] > Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 11:10 am > To: Morrison, John; cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Cc: ian AT caliban DOT org > Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units) > > > > === > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Morrison, John" > To: > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:02 PM > Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units) > > > > I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands... > > > ... > > > > Sorry to have caused so much hassle just to retract it :( > > I wouldn't worry - this is the whole point of having new > packages start > out as 'experimental'. It allows some breathing room. > > Rob > ======================================================================= Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use of this email. Experian Limited (registration number 653331). Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF