Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:40:01 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Figlet-2.2 Experimental
Message-ID: <20011208014001.GA14136@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 33 DOT 0112080132220 DOT 856-100000 AT poo DOT poo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112080132220.856-100000@poo.poo>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:33:58AM +0000, Carl Ebrey wrote:
>Hi again guys,
>
>Sorry about the delay in responding.  I've just been reading the archives
>for the list (because I wasn't subscribed to the lists at home, until just
>now that is) and I see there's been quite a lot of traffic.  I'm not in
>work until Monday now but as soon as I get there I'll upload the tarballs
>somewhere so you can peruse them at your own pleasure.  In the mean time,
>here's what I have for the setup.hint file (please remember that I'm
>writing this "from scratch" because the file's still in work):
>
>@figlet
>sdesc: figlet-2.2 Experimental
>ldesc: FIGlet is a program that creates
>large characters out of ordinary screen
>characters.   FIGlet can create characters
>in many different styles and can kern and
>"smush" these characters together in
>various ways.  FIGlet output is generally
>reminiscent of the sort of "signatures"
>many people like to put at the end of
>e-mail and UseNet messages.
>test: 2.2-Experimental
>category: text
>requires: cygwin
>
>Hope that helps you Chris.

In a sense it does.  The above has a number of problems.

The sdesc is incorrect, the ldesc needs to be quoted properly, and the version
number is wrong.

I guess I'm glad I asked.  If this setup.hint had showed up on
sources.redhat.com it would have confused the setuper updater.

Sorry.

cgf