Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:55:25 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Licensing: BSD-w/advert
Message-ID: <20011204155525.GB15432@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3C0C68C6 DOT 1050003 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3C0C8191 DOT 1030406 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C0C8191.1030406@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:56:01AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:
>It's paragraph #4 that I'm asking about.  Basically, does the old BSD 
>license satisfy the "open source" exception of cygwin's license?

What does http://www.opensource.org/osd.html say?

cgf