Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com To: "Ralf Habacker" Cc: "APPS LIST, NOT Gerrit P. Haase" Subject: Re: [REQ] apache-1.3.22 package available References: <006201c17cd4$e22c9c90$9a5f07d5 AT BRAMSCHE> Organization: Jan at Appel From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: 04 Dec 2001 16:29:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <006201c17cd4$e22c9c90$9a5f07d5@BRAMSCHE> ("Ralf Habacker"'s message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:03:51 +0100") Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii "Ralf Habacker" writes: > > > I like httpd most but www is probably easier to remember. > > > > I think /etc/apache is best, so is /var/apache probably best too. > > > I would prefer /etc/httpd as use by (suse) linux, but they have an exception for the docroot > =/usr/local/httpd In short: everyone likes to have it the way My Currently Favourite Linux Distro (TM) has it. So, because Cygwin is associated with Red Hat, why not standardise on that? (Personally I like /etc/apache, /var/www best, because that's what Debian does :-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org