Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <00c301c178b6$dcb25420$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Charles Wilson" Cc: , References: <009401c178b4$0d3d92b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C05FB2F DOT 2050409 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <00af01c178b5$aa39e860$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C05FD7E DOT 2090708 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Subject: Re: setup current problems Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:18:51 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2001 09:20:15.0636 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E3DBD40:01C178B7] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wilson" To: "Robert Collins" Cc: ; Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:18 PM Subject: Re: setup current problems > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > > Yes, which is why I'm fixing setup, not hammering on your door about > > setup.ini :}. > > Okay, well while you're mucking with the setup code, I've got a question > for you: > > 1) joe user has the autoconf package installed on his system. in the > past, autoconf depended only on cygwin, perl, m4 > > 2) now, the new version of autoconf depends on cygwin, perl, m4, AND > autoconf-devel + autoconf-stable. (I KNOW that joe user doesn't have > autoconf-devel/stable installed because they are brand new packages) > > Q: will setup automatically select autoconf-devel and autoconf-stable if > joe chooses to update his autoconf to the new version? Why? (merely > because -stable and -devel are NEW, or because of the new dependency > specified by setup.ini for autoconf itself?) The dependency. > Q: what if the new dependency was on a package -- say, 'squid' -- that > has been around a long time, and joe has previously skipped (so now it's > "permanently" skipped). Will setup present 'squid' as a new required > dependency and automatically select it if joe decides to update his > existing autoconf? Yes. Rob