Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:27:31 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils Message-ID: <20011128172731.GA4455@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C032ACF DOT 2040006 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <26215371467 DOT 20011127093129 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C0429FB DOT 335A4A78 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <143300493787 DOT 20011128091011 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C04AA81 DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C04AA81.5080804@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:12:33AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > >>>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name? This package is intended to >>>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a >>>>>single source code file of moderate length). > >> >>Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name? > > >Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. >Wouldn't that lead to confusion? Or would it actually be LESS confusing > for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)? > > >>BTW, I want this package, I'm using 'dos2unix' a lot. > >That's three! Cool! (But I still need to wait a few days in case the >all-powerful veto appears...) Booming voice: I am well pleased with this package. I think it should be chuckutils, though... cgf