Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <039001c17148$567b4df0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <3BF8385F DOT 8010606 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <02a301c17084$9b178b50$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF8B243 DOT 6090200 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011119181341 DOT GA1168 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: -src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:20:03 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2001 22:20:01.0926 (UTC) FILETIME=[54E98A60:01C17148] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > I have to say that I am also tired of this discussion. I didn't say so before, but ditto. > I don't really understand why so much effort is being put into an activity > that will really only benefit, what, 1% (probably an exaggeration) of the > cygwin community. > > I have no problem with Chuck packaging sources the way he wants to, Corinna > using her own method, and Robert using his. > > The binary installation in setup.exe needs work. It's going to start getting > a lot of gripes. I'd like to suggest that the source discussion be tabled > indefinitely. Do you mean the package selection, or the way the binaries are installed, or things like resumable downloads etc from the wishlist? Rob