Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:55:12 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Textutils 2.0.16-1 (part 1 of 3) Message-ID: <20011111235512.GA24543@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:57:48AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] >> You don't put install: or source: in it. It's supposed to be a "hint" >> for information that can't be inferred otherwise, like >> category, sdesc, >> or requires. > >Woops, my fault - it looked ok to me :[. Hmm, what would be neat would >be a setup.hint lint. That's a good idea. It should be easy to do this by pulling the parsing code out of "upset", putting it into a library , and... Hmm. Deja vu. >> Also, AFAIK, setup.exe doesn't allow different categories or >> requirements >> for different versions since these fields apply on a per-package not >> a per-version basis. > >You're correct, but they shouldn't cause parsing errors AFAIK. It didn't. The errors I got were wrt the use of [prev] and [curr]: latest/textutils/setup.hint: can't use [] in setup.hint latest/textutils/setup.hint: can't use [] in setup.hint I noticed the other stuff with my wetware parser. cgf