Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <034101c16af8$ecb393f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20011111211701 DOT GA23428 AT redhat DOT com> <032f01c16af8$57ff5730$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011111213318 DOT GA23506 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: Move zlib up one level, part 2
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:36:28 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 21:42:21.0344 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE321A00:01C16AF9]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> >Yes, you'll screwup Makefile.in, not per tag, but per revision.
>
> Interesting point.  So interesting you needed to make it twice, I
guess.

Sorry, haven't had my morning caffeine yet...

> >> The alternative is to create a new winsup/zlib directory.  I
believe
> >> that would mean that everyone would have to use the -P option when
> >> updating their directories to cause the empty directory to be
> >> automatically deleted.
> >
> >Yes. They'd have to anyway regardless of the way you do the move.
>
> Nope.
>

Oh? If you just mv the dir, what does CVS do in a sandbox if it's run
without -P?

Rob