Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:11:20 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin, screen, my patches Message-ID: <20011108161120.A4977@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <6EB31774D39507408D04392F40A10B2BC1FDD6 AT FDYEXC202 DOT mgroupnet DOT com> <20011108160518 DOT C4575 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011108160518.C4575@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >I hate to say this, but this is not reall off-topic for this >mailing list. Let's try again, in English: I hate to say this, but this is off-topic for this mailing list. >It's one thing to ask if screen could be a package but continued >discussion about screen porting should go to cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >until such time as it is an actual package. cgf