Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BE2F0A8.4030408@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 14:14:48 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT Com Subject: Re: /setup.html please read - feedback desired References: <1004700277 DOT 7488 DOT 2 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011102115453 DOT F26975 AT redhat DOT com> <3BE2EB1D DOT DA0B4178 AT yahoo DOT com> <20011102135451 DOT K26975 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just to clarify: The original suggestion was to install the sourceforge *software* on a Red Hat/Cygnus server. This was deemed overkill. Earnie's suggestion was to open a cygapp project on the VALinux/Sourceforge server, and use that. cgf has rejected *that* as well -- for unstated reasons (although you can guess: reluctance to rely on non-RH servers and/or competitors (VA Linux?). Resistance to decentralization. *SLOW* download speeds from sourceforge machines. etc.) --Chuck Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:51:09PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: > >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>The last time I asked about this somebody said "Use SourceForge >>>software". I think that would be a overkill for this requirement, >>>though. >>> >>> >>Yeah, probably overkill. Hmm... how about something like this: >> >>I have ported package foo-x.z that I would like to contribute, so I >>create foo-x.z-1.tar.gz and foo-x.z-1-src.tar.gz and upload that to >>cygapp.sourceforge.net/incoming. >> > > I am not going to use sourceforge. > > cgf >