Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:53:43 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /setup.html please read Message-ID: <20011102135343.J26975@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <6EB31774D39507408D04392F40A10B2BC1FDBD AT FDYEXC202 DOT mgroupnet DOT com> <20011102134725 DOT G26975 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011102134725.G26975@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:47:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:23:12PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote: >>2) Under "Making Packages", I think the "standard" for binary packages >>is to leave off the initial "/" on filenames inside the tarball. E.g.: >> usr/doc/cURL-7.9/README >>instead of >> /usr/doc/cURL-7.9/README >>I think the point is to allow someone to expand the binary package into >>some other location (besides "/") if desired for whatever reason. > >I think this is implied by: > > * Binary packages are extracted in /, include all file paths from the > root in your archive. > >Actually, this should be: > >/usr/doc/cygwin/cURL-7.9-1.README >or >/usr/doc/cygwin/cURL-7.9.README >>3) I realize this one is kind of nit-picky, but the 4th bullet under >>"Making Packages" mentions a "file" named /usr/doc/foo-vendor, when in >>fact this should call it a "directory". > >Actually, this is correct. This should be a file. Oops. Note to self: "Always check first before sending email." You're right, Kevin. cgf