Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:48:46 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /setup.html please read - feedback desired Message-ID: <20011102134846.H26975@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <1004700277 DOT 7488 DOT 2 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE2E3D3 DOT 1050201 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BE2E3D3.1050201@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:20:03PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Robert Collins wrote: > > >In the "Package file naming" section: >"In the event that a package doesn't sort correctly (for example, from >...-9-... to ...-10-..., use the setup.hint current, prev and exp labels to >override the inbuilt sort during the transition period." > >I think setup.hint's are more-or-less required, now. Otherwise, there's no >way to set the sdesc, ldesc, dependencies, etc. So, the "auto-sort" is a >soon-to-be-vestigial feature; emphasis should be on setup.hint. I don't think there is any reason to force the versioning in setup.hint. That's sort of error-prone, actually. Experience has shown that. cgf