Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 22:38:21 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: shellutils should be in base?
Message-ID: <20011101223821.A7348@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1004664106 DOT 5225 DOT 13 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1004664106.5225.13.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:21:45PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>See 
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-11/msg00055.html.

I think it should be in base, yes.

>BTW: who maintains shellutils?

That would be me, I guess.

cgf