Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: RE: cURL packaging progress
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:27:34 -0400
Message-ID: <6EB31774D39507408D04392F40A10B2BACC613@FDYEXC202.mgroupnet.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: cURL packaging progress
Thread-Index: AcFWgCVOZUE9De9yQzKeBexW4w4uSwAADVLA
From: "Roth, Kevin P." <KPRoth AT MarathonOil DOT com>
To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
   "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2001 20:27:34.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[FCDEB160:01C15680]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id f9GKSP722137

Considering it appears I was BCc'd (and the list wasn't copied), I'm
responding just to you two. 

I believe curl will be completely cygwin compliant (with all necessary
readme's, etc) as it is distributed from curl.haxx.se. For this reason,
I could do one of two things for submitting source tarballs to cygwin
(once curl is accepted as an official package):

1: submit in original form (meaning it will unpack as curl-7.9.1),
although
   we could easily change the name of the tar file to match.

2: download, untar, 'mv curl-7.9.1 curl-7.9.1-1', retar. This sounds
like
   more work, considering I would "typically" never expect to make any
   cygwin releases that didn't correspond to new curl releases. In other
   words, in most cases there will never be a curl-7.9.1-2.

I'm guessing #2 is your preference, however I'm just wondering if you're
open to accepting #1 in this case (obviously if there WERE a need to
release an interim cygwin version, it would then have to be named
appropriately and repackaged...)

--Kevin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:18 PM
> To: Corinna Vinschen
> Subject: Re: cURL packaging progress
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > Oops, Chris missed the release number in the example:
> > 
> >   curl-1.2.3-1.tar.bz2
> > 
> > The source analogous
> > 
> >   curl-1.2.3-1-src.tar.bz2
> > 
> > The source should unpack into a directory exactly named as the
> > archive
> > 
> >   curl-1.2.3-1/
> 
> 
> Oops. I didn't know this. I've been doing <srctop> = curl-1.2.3, not 
> curl-1.2.3-1.
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> 
>