Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:40:40 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygapp Subject: Re: Autotools; new versions Message-ID: <20011016104040.T1696@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygapp References: <3BAA33FD DOT 9C1B704C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010920143410 DOT B5666 AT redhat DOT com> <3BC94CE5 DOT 8070206 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011015111857 DOT I1696 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BCB0C10 DOT 6060409 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BCB0C10.6060409@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 12:17:20PM -0400 On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 12:17:20PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 04:29:25AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > >>P.S. corinna: I don't really want to take over maintainership of the > >>autoconf/automake packages, but I am making this contributition if you > >>(and the rest of the list) think it is useful. > >> > > > > Pooah. I'm not quite sure if I want to have that extra work. I'm > > maintaining autoconf and automake only since nobody else is doing > > that. If you can convince me that it's no extra work or that you're > > always available if something not ok with the script, though... > > > I'm not going to lie to you -- it IS extra work. However, I hope that > the extra work is *minimal* -- and to convince you that it is necessary. > > The "stable" branch: > autoconf-2.13 > automake-1.4p5 > I would assume that these will never need to be updated. All current > development by the GNU guys is on the 2.52/1.5 branches. > > the "devel" branch: > autoconf-2.52 > automake-1.5 > These are the versions you are already maintaining, and keeping current. > No *additional* work involved here. Just building with another --prefix, right? BTW, I would prefer a common path for both packages inside of /usr to not mess up /usr unneccessarily: /usr/autotool/stable /usr/autotool/devel > and I'll be around. That's most important ;-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.