Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <002901c154a1$03e8c9a0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Danny Smith" , References: <20011014103052 DOT 36737 DOT qmail AT web14510 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Subject: Re: GCC-3 additions - related question Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 21:11:44 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2001 11:17:31.0588 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0FE5040:01C154A1] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Smith" > Lately, I've been hearing this with STL code: > "This compile well using gcc! Why it not MS!" > Thats what I want -- the first part of that anyway. Danny, it sounds like you might know the answer to this: are there known issues for building native code using the cygwin gcc with C++ templates? Specifically, I've asked Chris on the developer list about using templates for some stuff (iterators particularly are getting real old for me), see http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2001-10/msg00018.html for the thread. Apparently Corinna had some reservations (Corinna - Are you still catching up on mail? :})... Rob