Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <20011014103052.36737.qmail@web14510.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:30:52 +1000 (EST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Danny=20Smith?= <danny_r_smith_2001 AT yahoo DOT co DOT nz>
Subject: Re: GCC-3 additions
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20011014004159.A3001@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

 --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at
02:32:15PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> >>I'd like to have fastcall conventions.  I think it is necessary if we
> >>want gcc to be a replacement for MSVC.
> >>
> >I'll need to think about that.  Do I really want that?
> 
> I'd say that you would for your own peace of mind.
> 
> It cuts down on the "This compile well using Microsoft!  Why it not gcc!"
> types of complaints.
> 

Lately, I've been hearing this with STL code:
"This compile well using gcc!  Why it not MS!"
Thats what I want -- the first part of that anyway. 

Danny

http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase
- Manage your files online.