Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:13:18 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: File handling in setup.exe Message-ID: <20011005111318.M13996@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3BBD05EB DOT 2357D53A AT etr-usa DOT com> <20011004212030 DOT C1118 AT redhat DOT com> <3BBDC86E DOT 2F179A18 AT etr-usa DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BBDC86E.2F179A18@etr-usa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 08:49:18AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> FWIW, I really like what you've proposed. It feels right. > >Thinking about it, I could do the Archive and Decomp parts first, >without doing the Source bits, which means I can leave the current NetIO >infrastructure alone. This gives immediate benefit, it conforms to the >original plan, touches as little code as possible, and yet is a good >step towards the Grand Refactoring plan. Little would have to be >changed in Decomp and Archive once that latter step is taken. > >I think I'll start hacking on these parts while we hash out the >specifics on the more grandiose parts of the refactoring. Ok, but I have to defer to Robert's observations on the way to handle this. He's done a lot more thinking about the subject than I have. Again, feel free to create a branch for working on this, if you want. The files in winsup/maint are reputed to be excellent for manipulating branches. Robert can probably provide more details on these tools. cgf