Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:58:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new 'temp' directory in CVS cinstall contains dependency WIP Message-ID: <20010924165808.A31556@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010919225819 DOT A26863 AT redhat DOT com> <0a3f01c1441a$948e0b60$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010923093415 DOT D28032 AT redhat DOT com> <0b7b01c14437$f5ecc730$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b7b01c14437$f5ecc730$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i Ok. I'm going to clarify and simplify: Here is what I'm asking: 1) If you are a package maintainer, check your entries in setup.ini for accuracy. Make any changes that you think are appropriate. Check them into cvs. Ignore the "rh" script. 2) Try setup.ini with a freshly compiled setup.exe. If it works fine for you, you're done. If it doesn't then debugging is appreciated. If this is confusing to you or if you think I've inexplicably changed the game plan from what I've been sending for the last couple of months, then you can just ignore everything and go back about your business. I'll just use what I've generated, which should be adequate. I'm not telling you how I'm going to generate it any more than I involve you in my cygwin mailing list activities. Rest assured that the setup.ini that people download will have this information in it. Other points: - The "rh" script is the same script that generated the previous setup.ini that I posted asking for people to change. - I switched to the Debian categories because I thought that was the consensus. - I am not doing away with the idea of allowing setup.hint to control update-setup's operation. I hope that covers all of Robert's objections. cgf