Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <099301c143fd$a77dc930$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Charles Wilson" , References: <3BAA33FD DOT 9C1B704C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010920143410 DOT B5666 AT redhat DOT com> <3BAA395C DOT 20B04AD8 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Subject: Re: Autotools; new versions Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:02:04 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2001 07:10:05.0081 (UTC) FILETIME=[C51C6090:01C143FE] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wilson" > > Robert suggested that debian has a wrapper that tries to infer which > > version of autoconf to run. > > > > Is this something worth considering? > > Yes. But I think the requirement for separate install prefixes still > remains. I don't know much about debian, tho, so take that with a large > chunk of salt. if be different prefixes you mean something like /usr/share/autoconf2.5 and /usr/share/autoconf2.13 then yes something is needed. THey do have conflicting files. Rob