Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:59:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: perl, second shot (was: Re: first shot perl) Message-ID: <20010821155943.B23843@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3B828838 DOT 9080401 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B82D37D DOT 24205 DOT FBBF7EA AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3B82D37D.24205.FBBF7EA@localhost>; from gp@familiehaase.de on Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:32:45PM +0200 Chuck, if this checks out with you, I'll put this and a source tar ball on sources.redhat.com. Gerrit, once I've uploaded the tar balls, the next step would be to send an announcment to cygwin-announce. You will do yourself a huge favor if you set the From: and Reply-To: parts of the header to 'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'. Please model your message on a recent cygwin-announce message. cgf On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:32:45PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Charles Wilson schrieb am 2001-08-21, 12:11: > >>> Oops, seems to be a problem with the timestamp-trick. The last build was >>> with multiplicity. Thats the reason why the tarball is so big... >>> I build with multiplicity because i got a lot of more errors during tests >>> without it. >> >> >>What sort of errors? In the past we were able to get 100 percent >>compliance with test suite and did NOT have to build with multiplicity. >> > >Yes I think it does make no difference. I would prefer to build with, if >it is not a problem with win98? >I do remember, that i did this build without setting ntsec, only >turned it on for a second harness... >The last build was done with 'ntsec' turned on. Works better:-) > >Without ntsec, the usual errors plus glob-basic.t > >Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >io/fs.t 29 4 13.79% 5, 7, 9-10 >lib/anydbm.t 12 1 8.33% 2 >lib/gdbm.t 68 1 1.47% 2 >lib/glob-basic.t 9 1 11.11% 8 >lib/ndbm.t 65 1 1.54% 2 >lib/odbm.t 66 1 1.52% 2 >lib/sdbm.t 68 1 1.47% 2 >op/stat.t 58 2 3.45% 9, 20 >8 tests and 96 subtests skipped. >Failed 8/275 test scripts, 97.09% okay. 12/12830 subtests failed, 99.91% okay. > >WITH ntsec-harness i got these errors, i wonder why groups.t failed with >ntsec in this previous build and failed not without ntsec. >Also dubious is the pragma/strict error. >One build before that i got a pragma/warnings error instead of pragma/strict. > >Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >lib/glob-basic.t 9 1 11.11% 8 >op/groups.t 2 1 50.00% 1 >pragma/strict.t 93 1 1.08% 21 >8 tests and 94 subtests skipped. >Failed 3/275 test scripts, 98.91% okay. 3/12830 subtests failed, 99.98% okay. > >After that i patched into groups.t, but it changes nothing. > >>> My last build is with multiplicity, so the 'cygwin' dirs could be removed. > >I removed them in the version '2' (URL see below). > >>> I also fixed 'ld2' now, and load it up in a few minutes. >>> http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/perl/perl-5.6.1-gph-2.tar.bz2 >> >>> released. >> >> >>Cool. I'll take a look... >> >>--Chuck > >gph > > >-- >=^..^= -- cgf AT cygnus DOT com Red Hat, Inc. http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/